And
the disciples were called Christians first in Antioch
Acts
11:26
Which
are we?
Jewish
Catholic
Protestant
None of
the Above!
If we
are none of the above, then what are we? Infidels? Heathen? Materialists?
Moslems? Buddhists? Cultists? It could obviously cover a lot of ground.
How about this one:
Simply
Christians
In a
world so filled with religious traditions and denominational
structures,
the
concept of being simply Christians is difficult to communicate, yet
a careful reader of the New Testament will realize that Jesus did not die so that
His followers could be divided into sects and parties. Jesus died
that He might reconcile all men in one body to God through the cross (Eph.
2:16).
To belong
ONLY to Christ, to have been baptized into the one body of which Jesus
Christ is the Saviour, is something altogether different from
belonging
to just
any one of the other 300 religious bodies in this country (1 Cor.
12:13;
Acts 20:28; Eph. 5:23). The Bible teaches there is to be "one body" and
"one faith," just as there is to be "one God, one Lord, one baptism,
and
one hope" (Eph. 4:4-6). This "one body" is the church of Jesus
Christ
(Eph. 1:22-23) which
Jesus built, not men (Heb. 8:1-2). This spiritual house is made up
of living
stones (1 Pet. 2:5) who are citizens of God's kingdom (Col. 1:13),
saints (set
apart ones) of the Most High God (Co. 1:2), having been born again
of water
and the spirit into God's family (John 3:5; Eph. 2:19). The church
of Jesus
Christ is "built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets"
(Eph.
2:20), not on the sand of denominational creeds and traditions. Jesus
Christ,
as the chief cornerstone (Eph. 2:20), is the only head (Eph. 1:22) and
all authority
in heaven and in earth rests in Him. This leaves no room for Popes,
councils,
synods, conventions or so-called "latter-day prophets."
Just
as Moses was warned by God when he was about to erect the tabernacle: "See that you make all things according to the pattern which was shown
you on the mount" (Heb. 8:5), Jesus built the church according to the
divine
pattern God gave Him. A house built by Martin Luther, John Calvin, John
Wesley, Joseph Smith, Ellen White, Mary Baker Eddy, the Popes of Rome,
the Watchtower Society, or any other is not recognized by the Lord.
"Except
Jehovah build the house, they labor in vain that build it" (Ps. 127:1).
Jesus said, "Every plant which my heavenly Father hath not planted
shall
be rooted up" (Matt. 15:13).
Jesus
warned the leaders of the various sects and parties of His day,
"Neglecting
the commandment of God, you hold to the traditions of men. You nicely
set
aside the commandment of God in order to keep your tradition.
You
invalidate the Word of God by your tradition which you have handed
down,
and you do many things such as that" (Mark 7: 8,9,13). Jesus quoted the
Prophet Isaiah to show the end result of such DENOMINATIONAL
LOYALTY,
"This people honors me with their lips but their heart is far away from
me, BUT IN VAIN DO THEY WORSHIP ME, teaching as doctrines the precepts
of men" (Mark 7:6-7).
Will
you be offended?
The teaching
of Jesus on the subject of loyalty to denominational traditions
offended
the members of these sects (Matt. 15:12). How will you react
to
the
teaching of Jesus? Does the appeal to be SIMPLY A CHRISTIAN
interest
you? Are you concerned with having a part in answering Christ's prayer
for unity among believers (John 17: 20-21)? Or does a plea to be
neither Catholic, Protestant, nor Jewish offend you?
If this
plea offends you, why? Do you view those who make such a plea today
to simply be another sect or denomination themselves? Do you view this
plea as coming from just another group of narrow-minded religionists?
This,
of course, is a possibility, but before you let your view hinder
your investigation
of this plea, realize that the family of God in the first century was
looked
upon by their enemies as being just another sect of the Jews and it was
everywhere spoken against (Acts 24:5; 28:22). Before you reject this
plea
that all be simply Christians, please investigate to see if it is
scriptural.
Neither
Catholic, Protestant, nor Jewish
There
is a group of Christians in your community who are neither Catholic,
Protestant
or Jewish. The intention of this message is not to defend and
uphold
any practices that originated with us, but to call attention to the
plea
of Jesus Himself concerning the unity of all believers (John 17:20-21).
We have
nothing personal to gain in the way of money, attention, or honor
by pointing
out the error of religious tradition and division. Quite the contrary,
by honoring only Jesus Christ, we repeatedly have been reviled by
religious
people of every faith. Loyal to the One who bought us and loving the
souls
of men, we heed the words of James, "My Brethren, if any among you
strays from
the truth, and one turns him back, let him know that he who turns
a sinner
from the error of his way will save his soul from death, and will cover
a multitude of sins" (James 5:19-20).
We do
not claim that we understand all truth, and believe anyone who claims
to
be infallible to also be guilty of blasphemy, but we do seek to point
men back
to the source of truth (Jesus and His Word) and point men away
from the
doctrines of men which Jesus said would make our worship vain (Matthew
15:9). It is for these reasons: our love for God and men, the shortness
of life, and the certainty of judgment, that we will use great plainness
of speech. We speak this way, not with a purpose of offending, but
to challenge you to "examine yourself to see if you are in the faith"
(2
Cor. 13:5).
Being
a Jew is different from being a Christian
It is
possible, of course, to be of Jewish blood and to be a Christian,
but not
possible at the same time to practice the Jewish religion. While there
are many good, moral, upright people of the Jewish faith who claim
allegiance
to the God of Heaven, they have rejected Jesus and are without the Way,
the Truth
and the Life. Jesus said, "No one comes to the Father but by Me"
(John 14:6),
and "For if ye believe not that I am he, ye shall die in your sins"
(John
8:24)..
In reality,
the Jews do not know God, because they do not know the Son (John
8:19; 14:7). If God were their Father, they would love Jesus (John 8:42).
I know we speak very bluntly and plainly, but we only speak the words
of our Saviour, the Hope of Israel and the world.
Being
a Catholic is different from being a Christian
A loyal
citizen of the kingdom of God will give allegiance to only one
king, one
head, one source of authority. A Christian recognizes that Christ is
the only
head of the church and that He rules from the right hand of God
and not
from Rome. A Christian will heed the warning that whoever
"exalteth himself"
on earth to such authority works iniquity (2 Thess. 2:1-12). The work
of Christ and His apostles does not mention such things and
doctrines as Clergy,
Pope Pontiff, Vicar, Cardinal, Archbishop, Abbott, Laity, Parish, Diocese,
Dominicans, Franciscans, Jesuits, Papal Infallibility, Bull, Litany,
Absolution,
Confessional, Limbo, Purgatory, indulgence, Penance,
Transubstantiation,
Mass, Sprinkling, Infant Baptism, God-Mother and Father,
Pater Noster, Catechism, Sacrament, Ave Maria, Lent, Christmas, Good
Friday, Ashes, Ash Wednesday, Palm Sunday, Relics, Epiphany, Praying
for
the Dead, Mortal Sin, Latria, Celibate, Easter, Confirmation, Holy Water,
Rosary, Sign of the Cross, Immaculate Conception, Bodily Assumption,
Mary as Medatrix, etc. All these doctrines came from some other source
than Jesus Christ. Jesus said such traditions make our worship
vain (Matt.
15:9).
NO MAN
EVER BECAME A CATHOLIC BY FOLLOWING THE BIBLE.
Being
a Protestant is different from being a Christian
Paul
made it plain that to be loyal to him or Apollos, or Peter, was not
to follow
Christ. "Has Christ been divided? Paul was not crucified for you, was
he?
Or were you baptized in the name of Paul?" (1 Cor. 1:13). Of course,
to imitate
another man as he imitates Christ is a scriptural principle (1 Cor.
11:1),
but to loyally line up with Martin Luther (Lutheran Church), John
Calvin
(Presbyterian or Reformed Church), John Wesley (Methodist), Joseph
Smith
(Mormon), Ellen White and William Miller (Adventist), Charles Russell
(Watchtower Society or Jehovah's Witness), or Alexander Campbell (Christian
Church) is to show disloyalty to Christ.
It is
only when we drop our loyalty to these men and their doctrines that
we can
"be of the same mind one with another according to Jesus Christ:
that with
one accord we may with one mouth glorify the God and Father of our Lord
Jesus Christ" (Rom. 15: 5-6). It is only when we drop our denominational
names, creeds, and organizations that we can obey the charge to "all
agree, and
there be no divisions among you, but you be made complete in the
same mind
and the same judgment" (1 Cor. 1:10). The only way to answer the prayer
of Jesus concerning all His followers "that they may be one that
the world
may believe," is to all listen and obey the same Lord and
authority (John
17: 20-21; Col. 2:8-10).
Simply
Christians
It goes
without saying, that a person could read the Bible from Genesis to
Revelation,
follow everything in it intended for men of this age, and he would
never be anything else than SIMPLY A CHRISTIAN. It would take something
else besides the Bible to make one a Lutheran (Luther's Catechism or
the
Augsburg Confession). It would take the Baptist Manual to make a Baptist.
It would take the 39 articles to make an Episcopalian or an Anglican.
One
would have to follow the Methodist Discipline to be a Methodist. You
can
become a Mormon if you want to, but not by following the Bible and the
Bible alone. You don't become a Jehovah's Witness without submitting to
the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society. What passage of scripture would
one obey
to become a member of any of these churches? What is it that
perpetuates
these denominational distinctions ~ obeying the scriptures or following
the commandments of men? Why will there still be Methodists, Baptists,
Lutherans, etc., tomorrow? Because all are following Jesus or because
at
least some are following men?
When
people on the day of Pentecost complied with the conditions of grace for
their salvation (Acts 2:38-41), "The Lord added to the church daily
such
as should be saved" (Acts 2:47). To which church did God add them?
Was Peter
a member of a religious organization that John did not belong to,
and was
Andrew a member of a denomination that Peter and John were not members
of?
Does
not this question seem absurd to you? Certainly no one would claim that
Peter, John and Andrew were anything other than SIMPLY CHRISTIANS!
They taught and practised the same thing in the name of Jesus Christ.
If
they were alive today, no denomination could claim them, for the
apostles'
teaching made men and women Christians, not Protestants or Catholics.
No
doubt, if Peter and Paul were alive today, they would be the enemy of
Protestant
and Catholic denominations, for their doctrine would conflict with the
traditions of men. If all believers today listened to the apostles'
teaching
as recorded in the New Testament, denominationalism would die a sudden
death. Did not Paul show the sinfulness of following men to the
Corinthians
(1 Cor. 1: 10-13)? Did he not teach the Ephesians that the only wall of
separation ever ordained of God to distinguish between men on a
religious
basis was the Old Testament, which differentiated between Jew and
Gentile?
Did not Paul say that Jesus broke down that wall of separation,
reconciling
all men in one body through the cross (Eph. 2:14-17)? Jesus died to
make
all men one religiously. Did not Paul define that one religious
body made
at the cross as the church of Jesus Christ (Eph. 1:22-23; 4:4)?
IS IT
NOT PRESUMPTUOUS FOR MEN TO BUILD AND MAINTAIN THE WALLS
OF DENOMINATIONALISM WHICH KEEP US SEPARATED RELIGIOUSLY? Is the Bible
still true? Is it still God's will that there is only
"one body, one Spirit, one hope, one Lord, one faith, one baptism,
and one
God" (Eph. 4: 4-6)?
The
Sin of Denominationalism
Did not
Paul condemn factions and heresy as a sin of the flesh that would keep
us from the kingdom of God (Gal. 5:20)? (Heresy is defined by Vine's Expository
Dictionary of New Testament Words as the choosing of an opinion,
especially a self-willed opinion, which is substituted for
submission to the
power of truth, and leads to division and the formation of sects.)
Heresy
is sin and those who commit it have no part of the kingdom of God.
Who has
the greater sin, the one who initially promotes the heresy, or
those
who
loyally uphold and practice it? Will not both lose their inheritance
in the
kingdom of God? Did not Jesus say to the leaders of the Pharisee denomination,
"Every plant which my heavenly Father did not plant shall be rooted
up. Let them alone, they are blind guides of the blind, and if a
blind man
leads a blind man, both will fall into the pit" (Matt. 15:13-14)?
When
do heresies, factions, and divisions cease to be sin? If a heresy or
denomination
began due to the damnable doctrines of one man 500 years ago,
is the heresy made right because it is 500 years old? Is the
self-willed opinion
of a small group of men 500 years ago made into the salvation of
Protestant
America because it is 500 years old and practised by millions of
people? Do the opinions and dogmas belonging to the "Church Fathers" of the
second and third centuries become the law of Jesus Christ because they
are over 1500 years old and reverenced by millions of Catholics the
world over?
Do the fake visions of Joseph Smith in the 1820's become the revelation
of Jesus Christ today because they are believed by the fastest growing
sect in the United States ~ the Mormons? These are questions that every
honest Catholic and Protestant must deal with.
Does
this author seem as an unnecessary alarmist when he warns that
most priests,
pastors and rabbis are teaching deadly doctrines of Satan that will
condemn
our souls if followed? Are we not aware of two Old Testament Priests
who were consumed by fire down from heaven because they "offered
strange fire before the Lord, which He had not commanded them" (Lev.
10:1-2)? Do we not recall our Lord's own warning, "Beware of false
prophets,
who come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening
wolves" (Matt. 7:15)? Will we continue to let the outward appearance
of moral purity and good works in the majority of religious leaders
deceive us into thinking that all are ministers of God? Did not
Jesus warn
us that "many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied
in thy name? And in they name cast out demons, and in thy name done
many wonderful works? And then I will declare to them, I never
knew you;
depart from me you who practice lawlessness" (Matt. 7:22-23)?
Didn't
Jesus say, "Not everyone who says to me, Lord, Lord, will enter the
kingdom
of heaven, but he who does the will of my Father in heaven" (Matt. 7:21)?
Did not Paul warn of religious leaders who would deceive us with their
righteous appearance, "For such men are false apostles, deceitful workers,
disguising themselves as apostles of Christ. And no wonder, for even
Satan himself disguises himself as an angel of light. Therefore, it
is not
surprising if his ministers also disguise themselves as ministers of
righteousness"
(2 Cor. 11:13-15)? Will we not wake up to the fact that when 300
different denominations teach 300 different creeds, that they
cannot all
be in harmony with Jesus Christ?
The
Irony of it all
It is
sadly ironic that most members of the various denominations not only
contradict
the will of Christ in their allegiance to the denomination of their
choice,
but they contradict the pleas of denominational founders and leaders.
Charles
Spurgeon, a prominent Baptist preacher, said:
"I look
forward, with pleasure, to the day when there will not be a
Baptist
living.
I hope the Baptist name will soon perish; but let Christ's name endure
forever." (Spurgeon's Memorial Library, Vol.1, p.168).
Martin
Luther, founder of the Lutheran Church, said:
"I pray
you to leave my name alone, and call not yourselves Lutherans, but Christians.
Who is Luther? My doctrine is not mine. I have not been
crucified
by anyone. St. Paul would not let any call themselves after Paul, not
Peter, but Christ. How then does it befit me, a miserable bag of
dust and
ashes, to give my name to the children of God. Cease, my dear
friends, to cling
to these party names and distinctions; away with them all, and let
us call
ourselves only Christians after him from whom our doctrine comes." (The
Life of Luther, Stork, p. 289).
John
Wesley, founder of the Methodist Church, said:
"Would
to God that all party names and unscriptural phrases and forms which
have divided the Christian world were forgot; that we all agree to
sit down
together, as humble, loving disciples at the feet of a common
master, to hear
His words, to imbibe His Spirit, and to transcribe His life
into ours."
(Tabernacle Sermons, Vol. IV, p. 216).
We cannot
help but wonder what changes would have taken place in religious
history had the followers of these men heeded their pleas. The pleas,
however, went unheeded. Denominationalism exists and will continue to exist
until our Lord roots it up in the last day. But meanwhile, no one
has to be
a part of the spirit of division and guilty of the sin of heresy.
CAN PEOPLE
TODAY BY SIMPLE FAITH IN AND OBEDIENCE TO JESUS CHRIST BE SIMPLY CHRISTIANS,
WITHOUT BELONGING TO A DENOMINATION?
"A resounding
YES! " To answer otherwise is to admit that the "faith which was
once for all delivered unto the saints" (Jude 3) is not the same today
as it was during the first century. In the first century, on the basis
of what was
written and spoken by the apostles (which has been written and preserved
for us in the Bible), people were able to obey God, and to do whatever
God wanted them to do. They were being saved; they were complete
in Christ, lacking nothing that pertained to life and godliness;
they were
dying in hope of heaven.
This
was centuries before the first human creed, centuries before the Catholic
Church was present to establish "Divine Tradition or to
"interpret" the
scriptures, centuries before there was a universal pope, long before
the doctrines of celibacy, sprinkling, transubstantiation, purgatory,
extreme unction,
Mary worship, and confession before a priest. It was 1800 years before
the doctrine of the infallibility of the Pope.
It was
1400 years before Luther's revolt against Catholicism, 1400 years
before
the Church of England (Anglican or Episcopal) or the Presbyterian
Church,
over 1500 years before John Smyth and the first Baptist church in
history,
and 600 years before John Wesley and the Methodist Church. It was
1700 years before Joseph Smith and Mormonism, and William Miller and
Adventism. It was 1800 years before a Jehovah's Witness knocked on your
door.
Do
you realize what this means?
It simply
means that all the creeds, the traditions, the "revelations," and the
institutions
of men that have cropped up over the past 1900 years to clutter the
religious scene and to confuse the minds of the people are at best unnecessary
... unnecessary to obedience to God, unnecessary to salvation,
unnecessary
to completeness in Christ, unnecessary to life and godliness, and
unnecessary to the hope of heaven. But it also means that the
whole concept
of modern denominationalism in not part of the true Christianity
originating
in the mind of God, revealed by the Holy Spirit, and preserved in the
new Testament. God purposed the church of Jesus Christ before He even
made the world (Eph. 3: 10-11; 1:3-4). Did He purpose the Lutheran Church
or the Episcopal Church from eternity? Did anyone ever become a
Jehovah's
Witness or a Mormon simply by obeying the scriptures? Did the Holy
Spirit, who inspired the apostles in the first century, reveal to
them the
doctrines and names that make the Baptists, Presbyterians,
Methodists, and
Catholics distinct denominations?
Can we
be SIMPLY CHRISTIANS? Certainly! No one ever became anything else
by following the Bible and Jesus. Follow the Word of God as it
stands, not
after it has been filtered through the creeds and doctrines of men, then
let that make of you what it will. It will make of you what it made of
others in the
book of Acts. Those who continued in the apostles' doctrine (Acts 2:42)
were believers, disciples, saints, Christians; it made a group of
them the
church of God or the church of Christ, and that is all the
apostles' doctrine
will ever make of anyone.
Author
unknown
